leondumoulin.nl/language/thriller/the-porkchoppers.php Its wide range of easily-obtained and installed extensions mean you can really make it your own, and there's support for parental controls and a huge range of tweaks and settings to ensure maximum efficiency. Future versions of the browser will make it very clear when sites aren't using HTTPS encryption, aiming to make it standard throughout the web. Like Firefox, Chrome now also supports password-free logins via WebAuthn — either to replace traditional passwords completely, or work as a form of two-factor authentication.
The browser also offers more features for web app developers, including more consistent experiences across different VR headsets, and the ability to use input from sensors such as your device's ambient light sensor and accelerometer. It launches fast, the UI is brilliantly clean, and it does everything its rivals can do with a couple of extras thrown in for good measure. The key reason we'd at least recommend having Opera installed alongside your main browser is its Opera Turbo feature.
This compresses your web traffic, routing it through Opera's servers, which makes a huge difference to browsing speed if you're stuck on rural dial-up or your broadband connection is having a moment. It reduces the amount of data transferred too, handy if you're using a mobile connection, and this re-routing also dodges any content restrictions your ISP might place on your browsing, which can be mighty handy. Opera automatically ducks out of the way if you're using secure sites like banks so your traffic is free and clear of any potential privacy violation. There's also an integrated ad-blocker — which can be switched off if you're morally inclined in that direction — and a battery-saving mode which promises to keep your laptop going for longer.
The default 'browsing experience' on Windows 10, and unavailable for older operating systems, Edge is an odd one. Quite why Microsoft needs to be running a pair of browser products in tandem rather than making Edge backwards compatible is beyond us. The company's reason, it seems, is that Edge represents the more user-friendly end of Redmond's offering while Internet Explorer scales a little better for enterprise.
Integration with Windows 10's core gimmicks seems to be Edge's main strong point. It happily runs as a modern-skinned app on Windows 10's tablet mode, and works with Cortana. It's also highly streamlined for the current web age, doing away with insecure protocols like ActiveX and forcing you into Internet Explorer if you want to use them. We're more used to browsers failing to render newer pages than we are to being told off for visiting older corners of the web. Curmudgeonly grumbles aside, actually using Edge is a perfectly pleasant experience. It's super-quick, hammers through benchmarks, its integrated reading mode makes complex sites more palatable, and by sandboxing it away from the rest of the operating system Microsoft has ensured that Edge won't suffer the security breaches of its older brother.
It's just a shame that Microsoft is quite so insistent on forcing Edge upon Windows 10 users, making it the default browser for links opened in the Mail app, adding shortcuts to your desktop after major OS updates, and presenting it as a potential result if you start typing 'Firefox' in the Cortana search box. Microsoft Internet Explorer has seen some ups and downs in its long tenure, from dominating the browser charts to languishing behind its main two competitors.
This is partly an issue of choice — particularly the browser choice that Microsoft was forced to give customers after a court ruling — and partially because older versions fell behind the rendering and compatibility curve. There are no such issues with Internet Explorer Plus it one-ups both of them on WebKit's Sunspider benchmark. That's not to say this browser is perfect. Google's V8 benchmark sees it struggling, and IE isn't quite as able to handle add-ons and extensions as many of its competitors.
So while there's no reason to avoid IE like there might once have been, if you're looking for a more customised browsing experience you're out of luck. Here's something a bit different. We all spend probably far too much time sitting in front of our web browsers, and up-and-comer Vivaldi wants to make that as pleasant and personal an experience as possible.
The whole style and structure of its interface is entirely up to you. There's a built-in note-taking system, you can dock websites as side panels while using the main window to do your main browsing, and we love its innovative tab stacking tech, which allows you to group up tabs and move them around to avoid the crowding that so often plagues other browsers. Vivaldi is built on Chromium, which means you can expand it even further with extensions from the Chrome Web Store.
Just pick your preferred plugin and click 'Add to Chrome'. I will never use Safari, period. The reasons to use it outlined in this propagandist drivel are outright laughable. Only problem I have with Safari is for some reason don't know if it's my network or what, but it doesn't affect Chrome , often when clicking on a link it'll just "sit there". No indication that I've clicked, no progress. Sometimes it eventually goes through, sometimes I have to open a new tab to get it to work. I'm also an unusual case in that I love Google's services but prefer macOS.
I still vastly prefer Google Music to the unholy mess that is iTunes and the strange mish-mash of services it has with Apple Music and 'legacy' stuff like iTunes Match. Partly this is because I have an Android phone - iOS feels a bit like iTunes now, an ageing relic of the Noughties that hasn't kept up with the rest of the world. Still having no weekend scheduling on "Do not Disturb" and no way to let specific apps bypass it is one of the real bugbears with me. Also if I want to do anything from my work desktop Windows , I'd have to go through iCloud, which still feels like a beta 5 years in with its missing features and slow interface.
Want to type an iMessage from the work desktop? I actually have to run Teamviewer now binned after the recent hacking fiasco or some other remote desktop to a Mac Mini at home in order to do so. Basically I ended up using my iPhone as a Google phone, so went the whole way - but if you use Google stuff then you're going to want Chrome on the desktop ideally.
However it is a breath of fresh air after using Chrome for a while - it's the first time I've heard my fans slow down in a long time. I think I'll have to switch for sanity. I do wish it wasn't "all in Apple" vs "all in Google". It'd be a much nicer world if they'd play nice and stop trying to force people to use their entire ecosystems.
So why did you by an Apple computer just to install Google on it? You could of saved a ton of money just getting a chromebook. For example, RAW photo processing, which is not possible on a Chromebook in any reasonable way I know there are some early attempts to provide cloud-hosted processing, if you have the bandwidth to quickly upload your 32GB shoot. That said, I was more relaxed with money and more entrenched in Apple's stuff back in when I got the Macbook.
I've since hopped off the Apple cart and have a refurbished Thinkpad. I've been a google fan also since the invite party days. However, on my mbp it slow down my system, hog the memory and doesn't just work well. I switched to safari, the difference in speed and is very noticeable. Safari browser is faster while browsing the web. I don't like the switch so far, as the safari does things its own way then I was used to chrome.
So until then, safari will be on as the main browser. Safari was so slow I decided to try Chrome as an alternative. It works.
I'm sure there's some reason why it was taking a minute or more to get into anything each time I opened Safari, but I don't know or care what it was, because switching to Chrome fixed everything. Do you guys and gals not hear well, read You're celebrating Mac for the trouble third-party applications -- several others were mentioned in comments -- have in integrating with it.
Sure, some of that is entirely on the third-party companies, but the common denominator is Mac. Windows was shunned for the same practices, albeit, understandably so. You can't deny that if this were flipped with any other company, you would not be championing it so. Please quit with the double standard that you feel being a Mac user affords you.
If Mac is great at anything, and it most certainly is, it's great at getting people to, at least momentarily, suspend their objectivity in it's favor. You can't blame Mac for Chrome when Chrome is obviously the one that is a hassle on your system. Just look at they way it's the only application to install a ton of files on your system including the hidden ones. If you're used to Windows then that is the issue not Mac. Windows file structre is horrendious hence the need to partition hard drives. Also you fail to mention Chrome only ships in bit for Mac.
So be biased all you want, but at least use facts. Mac Book Pro here; Capitan. Safari browser. Considering using Google Drive as a type of Portal for board of directors of nonprofit. But to print from Google docs, etc. I have downloaded the latest drivers for the printer; but no change in compatibility. Any suggestions? I have a problem Firefox, Safari, Chrome - each has its own set of problems, things I don't like about them, et cetera. Right now it's the fact that Chrome runs relatively well on my machine, while on the other hand I don't find Safari to be all that awesome.
Safari does its own thing differently from the other browsers, which is in keeping with Mac's and Apple's way, but I happen to also own a Windows PC and I have to work with Windows machines in my office I would prefer to work with either Chrome or Firefox as they are cross-platform; that way I might be able to sync my bookmarks across devices I can sort of do that with Firefox but it is probably the worst of the three. It has quite a few features that I really like but it seems to be unstable and slow in Win.
Chrome is alright but I could never get it to sync my bookmarks properly, and one day it even deleted a bunch of bookmarks I was trying to organize Now I'm trying to see if Safari will scratch my itch but I always find something that I think is really goofy about Safari that the other browsers don't do. My latest complaint: Google Drive works atrociously in Safari For some bizarre reason, things become unclickable on a regular basis and it makes it impossible to work; I'll select one item in the browser window, and after that I can't seem to interact with the rest of the page in any way You have a windows machine and since you dislike the mac so much sell it and just use the Windows machine in your office.
It has Firefox and Chrome. No need to worry about Safari anymore since you hate it and you hate Apple's way. I've recently switched to Safari from Chrome and the speed plus smoothness is very clear on a Mac computer compared to a Windows computer.
Safari works surprisingly faster than Chrome on a Mac! Is it me, but nobody is complaining about ads every millisecond. Adblock plus works great in Safari. My biggest complaint about Google is the Teriyaki on a toothpick, Jehovah Witness, in your face advertising instead of content. I'm on this page reading because I am reconsidering an ecosystem for a business platform. Browsing gives me the same experience as shopping for a new car and a salesman. Adblock plus is not blocking ads. Search for another adblocker.
To find out which one works the best browse a couple of the same pages that create popups while using different popup blockers to see which ones actually do block the ads. There was no reason for me to use Chrome on Mac. Safari suffices pretty well! When I attempted to upload a folder to google drive, it prompted me to use Chrome; a folder upload is possible only on Chrome. Create a folder in Drive then open the folder on your computer and select all the files then drag them to the folder in Drive. You shouldn't have to download chrome for something that simple.
I manage my multiple Google Drive accounts on Safari daily. I found this thread as it looks like you cant get advanced google analytics tools such as the page analytics extension, tag manager. Also facebook power editor is chrome only. I'm a college student and I'm looking at a MacBook Pro 13 or 15 in display.
My school requires chrome, Firefox, silver light plug. Will these work on my system? Thanks for this. I've noticed the performance and speed issues using Chrome against Safari. Recently switched back to Safari as too many issues slowing up my Macbook using Chrome making it almost unusable at times.
I've used Chrome for years having switched from Firefox and liked it's clean, simple look. I miss some of the extensions I use everyday in Chrome. Hopefully they will start to appear for Macs or I'll still need to revert to Chrome every now and then. I prefer to have everything in one place, working as intended not crashing my machine - yes even Macs can't cope every now and then and I've realised Chrome is probably the main culprit. My guesses for the root cause of Chrome resource hunger on Mac is: I used Firefox for a while, until a few years ago I switched to chrome because of the reduced CPU usage.
Then it broke, so I went back to Firefox, which is better in every way I know of. I'm not going back in the foreseeable future. Yes, it definitely makes your CPU work harder than usual I use an old macbook early with Lion on it and it automatically updated itself to the version And let me tell you it is a nightmare! Long time Mac user and owner or nearly every Apple product down to the Watch.. It's a refreshing thing after so many years of well iOS perfection to just play around with apps and settings and notifications coming from everywhere. I am currently using both my iPhone 5s and the Nexus and the transition is easy since I decided to stick with Gmail and platform agnostic apps like wanderlist, evernote, last pass and so on to minimize my platform dependance.
The Safari versus Chrome debate finds me in the Safari camp as a user, since I agree that Chrome has its own agenda and will never comply with Apple's philosophy. So I have a problem syncing my bookmarks but this is not really an issue, since after initial transfer, little change is happening most of my time is spent on apps.
I have a lowly 6 year old Mac. I've been using Firefox for a long while for it's small memory footprint, but it just feels so alien on the Mac, the UI everything. I've been switching between Chrome and Safari off and on, and from my experience Safari is less resource hungry than Chrome and runs circles around Chrome on the Mac when it comes to performance. The only thing I'm am really missing are proper favicons in tabs I really want that visual cue, I can't remember all page titles to recognise them immediately… and any decent kind of bookmark synching with Android.
But right now I'm back on Safari, it just supports all the OS X native technologies and is better integrated. Chrome is certainly not as efficient as Safari but then again the same can be said for Edge or Internet Explorer on Windows. The native browser always has a benefit of being because of its close development with the OS. Try that on the same week hardware with Windows or OS X? Google actually requires most employee's to use Mac's so it boggles my mind how they tolerate Chrome on Mac's? You would think they would fix the battery issues pronto. Most likely they don't see this as the big issue because most likely their facilities are filled with ample AC outlets to keep their Mac's on power supplies.
I use Windows, Mac's and a Chromebox and for me the native browser works best on all three.
Of course you have no choice on a Chrome device. OK, so I've been told I need to buy my child a laptop for school so he can be taught to use Google Chrome. He needs voice to text technology due to his learning disability. My first thought was a Macbook, as all of our systems at home are i-based, but now you have me re-thinking…. What do you recommend? It doesn't have to be anything fancy, he's We have some funding to use, so money is not a factor either….
Safari is also the worst performing browser in terms of being compliant with modern HTML5 web standards. Google can not simply do things the 'apple' way because apple is lagging behind in their HTML5 adoption. No one is forcing you to install Chrome or to use it and last time I checked it was free So what is your actual point here? All I can take away from the article is that you are a very angry individual. This is not journalism. I don't use Macs, and I use Chrome, but that's false. Saying Chrome isn't resource hungry on battery devices is crazy.
Also, of course they don't have to install it. They choose to install it for convenience. Its not lazy journalling. I'm sorry you got offended because someone hurt your preferred browser. Totally agreed - Chrome is resource hungry. My point is their is a reason for it. Apple has access to API's that chrome does not. Chrome is not installed on a mac by default. People choose to install it, people choose to use it, and their are other browsers available should the user require an alternative. So again whats the point of this article? Where's the journalism? You have expressed ten opinions - not ten fact's as to why people shouldn't use chrome.
I opened the same tabs on safari and chrome youtube and netflix. They took about the same time to load although chrome uses about x more CPU and 30x more energy.
Also you fail to mention Chrome only ships in bit for Mac. It's conventional wisdom that Google's Chrome web browser is often the culprit when your computer slows down. I now use both safari more so than firefox. Still having no weekend scheduling on "Do not Disturb" and no way to let specific apps bypass it is one of the real bugbears with me. All I can take away from the article is that you are a very angry individual.
Is that supposed to happen? I am on a high end Mac Pro, so Chrome's excesses don't bother me. I only switched from Safari a few years ago because at the time, Chrome offered some cool extensions that Safari did not. Most of those are now available on Safari, but now that I am comfortable with my solid workflow on Chrome, they need to give me a reason to switch back. Safari is better for mac. I grew up near that particular wonder, and I somehow doubt your Macbook is quite that loud.
Still, Chrome can be a problem. These aren't bad counter-points, and I thank you for leaving them. Having said that, the speed one isn't true in my experience. I'll admit I don't have numbers, though. Same, for the past month when i was opening serveral tabs on chrome my macbook would freeze and only way i could get my laptop functioning again would be to turn it off using the power button and switch it back on, after a month of this I just now deleted the app, it keep making my fans and start and heat up the device which has never happened in the year I've had it.
I now use both safari more so than firefox. I had chrome open, and guess what? Chrome takes 42, Seems like an outlier to me! There's a difference, but it shouldn't be that much. Did you have the same tabs open in each? On Safari, but thinking of switching back again. Better experience with Chrome especially when I'm a heavy Hootsuite user Hootlet. And I never seems to get Gmail on Safari to work - which makes everything harder when buttons and tabs stops responding.
Anyone with same experience? I switched from Safari to Chrome a few years ago. At the time, Safari suffered of latency problems is it solved? Never looked back on Safari but this article push me to test it again soon. I like Safari better but need Chrome for Amazon video because Safari only supports Silverlight for Amazon video as yet. No html5 so Chrome is by default my browser for that. I agree that Chrome is not so great for Mac's and its surprising given that Google mainly requires Mac's for employee's and I would think Chrome is used?
But I think the culprit in performance with Chrome is more due to plugins and specifically PepperFlash which is google's own version of Flash. Its really bad and many times lately crashes Chrome or freezes it. If you turn off Flash totally you will find Chrome behaves much better. But Safari definitely holds the advantage in saving on battery. If you are using a Mac and need battery life Safari is the browser and second is Firefox. Chrome is really the worst choice. Thank you for the article, course I prefer Safari being on a mac and all but for a few things I was inclined to use Chrome.
Thank you! I mean I've not really smashed it as I normally do with Chrome i. People can dis me, it's fine! I like the brutal feedback personally, makes me want to become a better communicator. I know this isn't Apple support but after very happily using Safari for a few days I've struck a brick call this morning. After a successful no quibble restart, the address bar has seized to operate as one. Happens when a new tab is opened, it freezes goes into shock and creation of new pref file by removing the current, clearing caches, clearing caches. Again, no expecting a resolution as this isn't Apple support, just my 2p.
Of course I'd be happy if someone has some tricks up their sleeves and would like to share. Disabling the search suggestions should fix it until Apple sorts out the problem. Well thank you for that. Allowed to work with Firefox for a bit while I couldn't make Safari work. Point to add though, still better at NOT eating battery, Firefox that is. Not as much as Chrome I mean. Fan speed pretty calm and all. Not by a long shot. If you are looking for maximum battery life Safari should be your first choice. No surprise here given that they know the ins and outs of App Nap.
One issue I do have with Safari is the use of extensions. They simply don't work as good as on other browsers. And if you have multiple extensions handling the same content e. WOT and some security suite browser extension they usually interfere with each other making Safari rather sluggish. Firefox uses a website for preferences just like Chrome. Does that make both of them outcasts or is Apple lacking behind the trend? Safari "is supported" on all OS X versions but there are differences.
Here is a funny story about that: Before Christmas I encountered an issue with a business web platform for productions and logistics which worked just fine on OS X So looks and versions can be deceiving. I really did prefer when Firefox had its own window for settings, but they've also decided it's easier to not maintain different GUIs.
Oh well. CMD-Q holding combo in my opinion is one of the better features in Chrome since a lot of action is happening around the Q button: So once in a while hitting Q by mistake is a real possibility for me. Some of the features are not native since it is a multi platform browser. Safari isn't. Also I would suggest you looking for hify chrome extension which will greatly reduce the issue with video playback on youtube and keep your computer cool and nice, in the price of bit more bandwidth.
This article seems like 2 or 3 valid points stretched out for the clickbait-style headline which nobody argues that they work, but doesn't necessarily make it respectable journalism. Chrome does things its own way instead of the Mac way and it causes a lot of inefficiencies battery life, processing, etc. As far as I'm aware though I'm no expert , their apps make it more efficient than running purely on HTML, so if you're using google's web ecosystem on chrome Docs, Youtube, etc.
You're right, I was probably leaning a bit too much on ranting and not enough on evidence for this one. I'm learning from it, though it's a conflicting bit of feedback I'm getting because more people are reading this article than most. Still, my job is to be both entertaining and useful, and I can always do with some feedback, so thank you.
I am in college and there are some web based programs we have to use for classes that do nof work properly in Safari. Those program's support have told the professors that we need to use chrome or sometimes even Firefox depending on the program. It's too bad that Safari doesn't work well for you, or even Firefox. Lots of people feel stuck with Chrome, and I guess you're one of them. I agree with Dushan, this is ridiculous and sad that Makeuseof has fallen this far.
It used to have real articles based on fact. I'm unsubscribing - there are enough reliable sources of information out there that I don't want to waste my reading time on hatchet jobs. I and over users I support use chrome without any of the made up isssues I'm reading of here. It's hard, because while I'm seeing complaints like this and sincerely want to learn from them, I'm also getting way more positive comments and traffic than is typical.
Put simply, writing in a way that everyone finds interesting and useful is really, really hard and even though I've been doing this a long time sometimes I'm going to fall short of the mark to some of the audience most of the time. In this case I wanted to put all the arguments against Chrome in a single place for future reference. I realize now that I could have spent more time collecting numbers for the first few points, and will try to do that next time.
Thanks again for the feedback and I hope you don't stop reading the site on my account.
The energy use criticism is not made-up—it's a well-established problem. Chrome also does a lousy job of going to sleep. The rest of the article, yeah, a mixed bag, and highly subjective. Frex, I don't care about the notifications integration, because there's nothing I can do with a web browser that I want to have notifications for. Plus, I don't use the OS X notifications system, because Growl is so much better, so I only care whether something plays nice with growl, rather than Notification Center.
I should mention that One note is a Microsoft product. The folder mentioned only accessible through Chrome is because One Note online is enabled through a Chrome extension so of course it is only accessible through Chrome. But it is not really a part of Chrome. I have also noticed a slowdown while using Chrome on my Mac. Anecdotally, it seems Safari is better on the Mac. Things appear to get worse when you add flash enabled applications Zynga games, etc. Always been happy with it, but sometimes used Chrome. Hardly any more. But what I have noticed in the past year since moving to Yosemite on my iMac haven't made the leap to El C yet , and still using Safari, my iMac gets pretty darned hot.
A lot of processing means a lot of energy consumed means a lot of heat. This article is spot on with my experience. I loved Chrome until it wrecked my MacBook Pro's ability to function - around the time Mavericks came out. First it was the fans. Then fans and battery life. Then it was fans, battery, and spinning beach ball of death for every tab or app I opened. I reached out to Apple and Google and finally just deleted Chrome and migrated to Safari. There was a thread on Google help for over a year that only ever got "we're working on it" type responses every once in a while.
This despite the significant number of people posting about all these same problems. My MacBook Pro late never fully recovered. But it still occasionally lags spinning beach ball when nothing but Safari is open. I removed all the Google files Chrome created, but still wonder if there is some incompatible file somewhere slowing things down. Poor read, and a sad attempt at rebellion. Wonder if the "N" word would have generated almost no attention I've been a Chrome user for a while, but I thought I'd give Safari a shot after reading this article.
So far, it seems to be working okay, but it does feel notably slower on some sites BoardGameGeek, for one. It's weird; some sites seem really snappy, but other feel way more sluggish than they did in Chrome. As yet undecided. Things seem to have sped up, back to about the level of Chrome. I haven't paid much attention to battery life, mostly because I generally work from my desk while plugged in.
I do really like the idea of using one less Google product, though! Where is the science behind any of these claims? If you are going to bash a product at least prove with real numbers that what you say is true. People will take your argument seriously then. I don't want to be, I've got a real soft spot for the company. You can pry my Gmail account from my cold dead hands.
But increasingly, yes, I'm uncomfortable with Google and trying to spread my computing across multiple companies instead of concentrating everything with one. I have a wonderous 27 inch Mac desktop. I use Safari and have resize each page to take advantage of the screen's size. And I have to do this each time I open that page. Tiresome and annoying. I use Chrome, which doesn't have this problem. And it may just be me but I can't discern one tab from the next at the top of the browser. Again, tiresome and annoying. Those are really annoying problems, I could see sticking with Chrome given them.
Especially seeing as you don't have a battery to worry about. I would gladly switch back to Safari, if I could only have the same experience I have with Chrome, when using the Delevoper Tools. The ones provided by Safary are counter intuitive and lacks a lot of feature I just can't miss. I don't really care about extensions, profiles or synchronization between different devices: I just badly need that Developer Tool.
For speed comparison purposes we tested performance using the JetStream benchmark tool. In Safari has been the built-in browser supplied with macOS/ Mac OS X for . Google has the resources to make Chrome the best browser out . A foot soldier in the browser war of the early 21st century, Firefox. We pit the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Opera, Edge, and Vivaldi against If you also use an iPhone and/or an iPad, then using Safari on your Mac will.
I feel trapped yes - because i am forced to use the Google Drive app on the Mac. But on the other hand some pretty common things like "View Page Source" and "Inspect" and responsive web testing as part of the Inspect element are avalaibale in Mozilla and Chrome and somehow lacks on Safari. Basically Safari is a very casual average-Joe experience, though fast and bateri effiencient, yet slow on feature development pin tab was introduced less than a year ago. I use Safari for my everyday Youtube watching, but work related stuff i need Chrome even if i don't want to.
Did you enable the Developer menu on Safari? It's not perfect but it does the things you've stated if I recall correctly. I've used Google Chrome for years and I've never had a problem with it. I'm running OS X The one thing I do dislike however, is the bloat. It just doesn't make any sense. Anyway, thanks for the article. The only reason I use Google Chrome is because of the speed and compatibility.
It seems to work with everything and load pages rocket fast. How's you experience with the speed? Chrome notification center has been gone from OS X for a couple of months. Maybe the author hasn't actually used Chrome browser in a while. Decent article though. It's not that awesome as it should be, but it's there. If you open Chrome on two different Macs, you'll see a continuity icon on the dock that, if clicked, will open the active tab of the other mac.
Days ago, I downloaded a chrome update for my macbook I opened it up, and it was sloooooooooow! I couldn't believe how slow it was. Luckily, the older version was still installed, so I was easily able to go back to my previous version. I know that eventually I will have to update, but because of this article I may just switch to safari instead of updating chrome.
It's only a discussion about the environment you pay for or provide your data for abstract metaanalysis stuff, one of the oldest topics since "branding". Mixing those environments is tge biggest fault to make, stick with one. Could you also analyze and refer to the googlish Android-Ecosystem and compare that to the applish iOS? I should look into the various ecosystems more, but my real passion is cross-platform tech to be honest. Top Deals. Chrome for Mac: Browsers Mac Safari vs. Email Facebook Whatsapp Pinterest Twitter.